Western Political Thought

FINAL EXAM1 . Explain whether J . S . Mill s prognosticate for eccentricity in On Liberty and Alexis de Tocqueville advocacy for expedience mightily dumb in Democracy in America , Vol . 2 , embrace , modify , or reject J . J . Rousseau s negationist conception of freedom - I have never believed that human beings s freedom consisted in doing what he lacks , but rather in never doing what he does not want to do - as expressed in Walk 6 of Reveries of the Solitary handcart ? Whether your position is that either Tocqueville or Mill rejects , embraces , and /or modifies negationism inform how this outlook fits into their respective theories on the main problems confronting liberal- democratic societies ? And eventu every(prenominal)y exercise on the following question : individuals of Nietzsche s master or hard wor ker moralities are more apt to cover a negationist get down to life in a democratic settingJohn Stuart Mill , Alexis de Tocqueville and blue jean Jacques Rousseau have all contributed to the philosophy of liberty , freedom and nation .

In my analysis , freedom being a strong element in democracy has been interpreted in searching terms by each of them by providing different tones to self-interest and individual liberties and then creating seemingly unique understanding besides embracing the identical ideas that work in liberal democratic societies . Put it plain , they might have used divers(prenominal) techniques yet with common goals toward democracyIn strain however , Mi ll s call for eccentricity as expressed in h! is On Liberty and Tocqueville s picture of self-interest properly understood in his Democracy in America reflect two...If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay